I Hope the Severed Head of Walt Disney Doesn’t Sue Me
Thanks to my friend Jen for obliging me and taking the time to sketch this piece. My drawings look like something Muhammad Ali tried to whip up with his left […]
The film Kick-Ass was released a little over a year ago. A tale of a comic-obsessed teen who decides to don a mask himself and fight crime, it sounds like something I would have loved to flush two hours of my life down the toilet with. Only I didn’t, my decision to not see the movie heavily influenced by Roger Ebert’s scathing review, in which he derides the film as “morally reprehensible” and, in so many words, calls it a piece of shit.
Kick-Ass reared its head on Netflix streaming earlier this week, meaning I had to watch it by law. I found the movie to be crisply-directed, emotionally engaging and possessing one Hell of a soundtrack, the vast majority of critics on Rotten Tomatoes agreeing with me. It begs the question “Why was Roger so off the mark?” (Please note that I didn’t refer to Kick-Ass as “kick-ass” in my review. Anyone making that folly deserves to get their scrotum worked like the pump on a blood pressure monitor.)
I know what you’re thinking: “He’s a movie critic. They suck. Get over it.” Ebert, however, stands on his own. I trust the man’s reviews implicitly, with two exceptions: Comedies and movies about black people. Roger is too kind too middle-of-the-road comedies like The Hangover, too harsh on dick-joke-a-thons like Shallow Hal. As for black flicks, he grades them on a one or two star curve. What do you want? He’s got a black wife. I begrudge no man trying to secure himself a little pussy after a hard day of work. Just know what’s up if you someday see a four star review of Soul Plane 2 out of the man.
Roger hated Kick-Ass because he felt that graphic violence both dished out by and inflicted upon a pre-teen girl, with no exploration of her emotional state afterward, was soulless. In his words, “This movie regards human beings like video-game targets. Kill one, and you score,” which leads him to bemoan we products of the Internet age and what he perceives as a lack of sensitivity to violence on our part.
I, on the other hand, had very little issue with what was taking place on screen. Yes, it was bizarre seeing a little kid kill a small army of mobsters, but it was also terribly awesome and grin-inducing. And, while I wasn’t a fan of the scene where Chloë Moretz’s character gets smacked around, I never lost sight of the fact I was watching a movie, either. Violent things have been happening to good people in movies since Bambi. Walk it off, buddy.
So there you have it. If you’ve watched Kick-Ass, I want to know if you agree with Roger Ebert in its inherent moral bankruptcy or if you, like me, thought the film was great and that Robert was a little off the mark this time. Man, what a boring ending. Let’s see if I can go out on a laugh with a little help from my buddy Pedo Bear.
Tagged as: kick-ass, Movie Review, Roger Ebert.
admin May 9, 2011
Thanks to my friend Jen for obliging me and taking the time to sketch this piece. My drawings look like something Muhammad Ali tried to whip up with his left […]
John Papageorgiou September 3, 2024
John Papageorgiou August 18, 2024
BrendaBren on May 11, 2011
Ha ha, I didn’t know what your reference to “Pedo Bear” was. I immediately read it in Spanish at first as “Fart Bear” and then “Drunk Bear.” ….uhmm….not funny NOW but you had to be there.
Mary Beth on June 28, 2011
“..trust the man’s reviews implicitly, with two exceptions: Comedies and movies about black people. Roger is too kind too middle-of-the-road comedies like The Hangover, too harsh on dick-joke-a-thons like Shallow Hal. As for black flicks, he grades them on a one or two star curve.”
Funny you blogged about this. I recommended “Napolean Dynamite” to a co-worker, who immediately checked Ebert’s rating (wtf) to decide if he wanted to take my advice. Of course Roger gave Napolean a poor rating of ONE out of five stars.